|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Zitat von Q241191
Noem defends no exception for rape, incest in South Dakota trigger law: No reason for "another tragedy" to occur
| | South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem on Sunday defended her state's abortion trigger law that took effect after the Supreme Court's decision to strip away the constitutional right to an abortion. She said in an interview with "Face the Nation" that in the cases of rape or incest, she does not believe one tragedy is "a reason to have another tragedy occur."
"I believe every life is precious ... And we know so much more using technology and science than we did even 10, 15 years ago about what these babies go through the pain that they feel in the womb, and will continue to make sure that those lives are protected," Noem said. "And I just have never believed that having a tragedy or tragic situation happened to someone is a reason to have another tragedy occur." | |
| |
Ich fürchte, das Cover der Libération wird bittere Realität werden.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oof 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dieser Mann hat's vorgemacht, wie Waffenrechte und Pro-Life für Kinder zusammenfinden können. Erschiess einfach nur die Mutter 
| | Eine 20 Jahre alte Frau ist in New York erschossen worden, während sie ein etwa dreimonatiges Baby im Kinderwagen schob. Der Vorfall ereignete sich am Mittwochabend (Ortszeit) auf der Upper East Side Manhattans, wie die Polizei mitteilte. Der Täter ein Mann im schwarzen Kapuzenpulli habe einen einzigen Schuss abgefeuert und sei daraufhin geflohen.
Die Frau sei wenig später in einem Krankenhaus für tot erklärt worden, hieß es, das Baby sei unverletzt.
| |
https://www.spiegel.de/panorama/justiz/new-york-frau-schiebt-baby-im-kinderwagen-und-wird-erschossen-a-ad0b45dc-fd5b-4a3c-a082-121ad44d9e73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liest sich ja wie eine Hinrichtung oder ein Auftragsmord.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | WASHINGTON, June 29 (Reuters) - The White House is unlikely to take up the bold steps to protect women's right to have an abortion that Democratic lawmakers have called for in recent days, interviews with officials show.
In a speech after the rollback of the Roe vs. Wade decision on Friday, President Joe Biden slammed the "extreme ideology" of the conservative-leaning Supreme Court, but said then there are few things he could do by executive order to protect women's reproductive rights.
[...]
But the White House is pursuing a more limited set of policy responses while urging voters and Congress to act. The White House's plans include a range of executive actions in the coming days, as well as promising to protect women who cross state lines for abortions and support for medical abortion.
Biden and officials are concerned that more radical moves would be politically polarizing ahead of November's midterm elections, undermine public trust in institutions like the Supreme Court or lack strong legal footing, sources inside and outside the White House say.
Biden is "telling people the truth and putting the focus where it needs to be, holding Republicans' feet to the fire for the harm they're causing," a White House official said when asked about the strategy. | |
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/biden-unlikely-meet-bold-democrat-demands-after-abortion-ruling-sources-2022-06-29/
GG, Dems haben aufgegeben.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wie die Demokraten nach 4 Jahren Trump immer noch Angst vor einer weiteren Polarisierung haben...
Wobei ein Problem halt auch hausgemacht ist. Deren Mehrheit im Senat trägt halt nicht alles mit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Zitat von Aspe
Wobei ein Problem halt auch hausgemacht ist. Deren Mehrheit im Senat trägt halt nicht alles mit.
| |
Das ist die Sache, ihr tut grad so als gäbe es irgendeine Option für Biden, irgendwie mehr zu tun. Klar könnte er jetzt auf den Tisch hauen und sagen "Filibuster abschaffen, SCOTUS erweitern, jetzt!"... und dann fällt das im Senat durch und das wars, das hat dann irgendwie auch nix gebracht.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Einfach per Executive Order regeln.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supreme Court says EPA does not have authority to set climate standards for power plants
| | The 6-3 ruling said that Congress, not the Environmental Protection Agency, has that power.
The court’s ruling on the case affects the federal government’s authority to set standards for planet-warming pollutants like carbon dioxide from existing power plants under the landmark Clean Air Act.
The decision is a major setback for the Biden administration’s agenda to combat climate change, specifically the goal to zero out carbon emissions from power plants by 2035 and halve the country’s emissions by the end of the decade.
The case stems from the EPA’s directive in 2015 to coal power plants to either reduce production or subsidize alternate forms of energy. That order was never implemented because it was immediately challenged in court. | |
| | Justice Elena Kagan wrote a dissent, which was joined by the court’s two other liberals.
“Today, the Court strips the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) of the power Congress gave it to respond to ’the most pressing environmental challenge of our time, ” Kagan wrote in that dissent.
“The Court appoints itself — instead of Congress or the expert agency—the decisionmaker on climate policy. I cannot think of many things more frightening,” Kagan wrote. | |
|
|
[Dieser Beitrag wurde 1 mal editiert; zum letzten Mal von Armag3ddon am 30.06.2022 16:38]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regierung gründet Umweltorganisation (übrigens unter Nixon).
Umweltorganisation macht ihre Arbeit.
USSC sagt halt stop, so wichtige Sachen darf die Umweltorganisation dann doch nicht entscheiden.
Top fucking kek, wenn es nicht so apokalyptisch wäre.
Ganz nebenbei, werden solche Entscheidungen als dem Supreme Court noch die nächsten Jahrzehnte zu erwarten sein.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supreme Court to take on controversial election-law case
| | The Supreme Court on Thursday agreed to hear a case that could dramatically change how federal elections are conducted. At issue is a legal theory that would give state legislatures unfettered authority to set the rules for federal elections, free of supervision by the state courts and state constitutions.
The theory, known as the "independent state legislature theory," stems from the election clause in Article I of the Constitution. It says, "The times, places and manner of holding elections for senators and representatives, shall be prescribed in each state by the legislature thereof."
In its most extreme form, the independent state legislature theory was invoked — unsuccessfully — by Trump advocates in an effort to sidestep the legitimate outcome of the 2020 election. In Arizona, for instance, some Trump supporters used the theory in calling for the decertification of the state's electors. Among those seeking decertification was Virginia Thomas, the wife of Justice Clarence Thomas. | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Zitat von Aspe
Ganz nebenbei, werden solche Entscheidungen als dem Supreme Court noch die nächsten Jahrzehnte zu erwarten sein.
[/b] | |
Ich habe das Gefühl, der Supreme Court wird jetzt auf Jahre hinweg nur noch GOP-freundlich entscheiden und die Demokraten können nur zuschauen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All it needs is a good guy on a rooftop.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ich glaube tatsächlich für die langfristige Perspektive wäre es "nützlicher" wenn Alito morgen tot umfällt als Trump...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
eventuell Clarence Thomas gleich noch hinterher.
Nachdem ich vor ein paar Wochen gelesen habe, dass seine Frau mittendrin war, als es darum ging das Wahlergebniss von 2020 zu kippen, wurde mir ganz schlecht.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ginni_Thomas
| | According to The New York Times, in the days following the 2020 presidential election, the board of the Council for National Policy issued a call to action to its members to keep Trump in power, despite his loss.[35] The call to action instructed members to "pressure Republican lawmakers into challenging the election results and appointing alternate slates of electors."[35] In May 2022, The Washington Post obtained emails Thomas had sent to Arizona legislators beginning days after the November 2020 election, urging them to choose "a clean slate of Electors." Though the emails did not mention either presidential candidate, Biden had been declared the winner in Arizona. She wrote the emails on a platform that allowed pre-written form emails to be sent to multiple elected officials, and she sent them to 29 lawmakers.[41][42]
Prior to January 6, Thomas promoted a Stop the Steal rally on Facebook.[43][44] Thomas told the Washington Free Beacon that she attended the Stop the Steal rally that preceded the January 6 U.S. Capitol attack but left before Trump took the stage at noon.[45]
After January 6, baseless claims that Thomas had paid to shuttle demonstrators to Washington D.C. proliferated online.[46] A year after the attack, fact checkers again debunked claims that Thomas was one of the organizers of the events of January 6, 2021.[47]
The Washington Post reported that after the storming of the U.S. Capitol, Thomas, on a private email LISTSERV of her husband's former law clerks, expressed her apologies for contributing to a rift among the group.[48] The internal rift reportedly concerned "pro-Trump postings and former Thomas clerk John Eastman, who spoke at the rally and represented Trump in some of his failed lawsuits filed to overturn the 2020 election results."[48] Eastman is a close friend of both Thomases.[49]
An April 2022 Quinnipiac poll found that 52% of Americans said that, in light of Ginni Thomas's texts to Trump's White House Chief of Staff, Mark Meadows about overturning the results of the 2020 presidential election, Clarence Thomas should recuse himself from cases about the 2020 election.[50] | |
|
|
[Dieser Beitrag wurde 1 mal editiert; zum letzten Mal von eupesco am 30.06.2022 21:29]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jo, bei den neueren Kandidaten, selbst wenn sie von Trump ernannt wurden, vermute ich dass da noch gewisse Hemmschwellen da wären die Demokratie komplett abzuschaffen. Bei Thomas und Alito weiß ich es echt nicht 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Zitat von Delta
Jo, bei den neueren Kandidaten, selbst wenn sie von Trump ernannt wurden, vermute ich dass da noch gewisse Hemmschwellen da wären die Demokratie komplett abzuschaffen. Bei Thomas und Alito weiß ich es echt nicht
| |
Ailto, Thomas genauso wie Gorsuch, Kavenaugh und Coney Berrett sind alle mit dieser ekelhaften "federalist society" im Bett. Da brauchste die Hand nicht rumdrehen von denen ist kein Fünkchen gutes zu erwarten.
Und die Demokraten sind so impotent bzw. geschmiert das sie die Scheisse abnicken statt sich mal endlich auf die Hinterfüße zu stellen im Stile eines Lyndon B. Johnson.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Only a good guy with a democratic mandate can stop a bad guy with a democratic mand.... Oh.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kann mir gar nicht vorstellen wie man sich so einen Job freiwillig antut.
Wenn du weißt das deine direkten Kollegen mit denen du täglich diskutieren musst solche Arschlöcher sind.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ich... also... was?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Es hört einfach nicht auf
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Erst Kissen, dann Coronamasken, jetzt Sandalen.
Was geht bei Lindell?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hergestellt in China für 1,99?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vergesst seine Zigarrenwerbung nicht!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | Liz Cheney’s closing statement in last night’s debate among the Republican candidates for representative from Wyoming. | |
Die einzig halbwegs Normale bei dieser Gruselveranstaltung. Worst-of oder wie das heißt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
School's out forever: Arizona moves "to kill public education" with new universal voucher law
Families who bail on public school will get $7,000 per kid in GOP's new scheme: "Every red state" urged to follow
| |
| |
Ducey said the law had "set the gold standard in educational freedom" in the country, and right-wing politicians and education activists quickly agreed. Corey DeAngelis, the research director of Betsy DeVos' school privatization lobby group American Federation for Children, declared on Twitter that Arizona "just took first place" when it comes to school choice. Anti-critical race theory activist Christopher Rufo the Manhattan Institute fellow who this spring called for fostering "universal public school distrust" in order to build support for "universal school choice" tweeted, "Every red state in the country should follow [Ducey's] lead," since the law "gives every family a right to exit any public school that fails to educate their children or reflect their values."
| |
https://www.salon.com/2022/07/01/schools-out-forever-arizona-moves-to-public-education-with-new-universal-voucher-law/
Republikaner wieder mit dem größtmöglichen Richardmanöver.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Thema: Der Biden-Thread ( USA Staffel 2 ) |
