|
|
|
|
Das ZDF hat einen sehr ordentlichen Mastodon--Account. Sogar mit eigener Instanz. Find ich gut.
https://zdf.social/@ZDF
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Zitat von Sniedelfighter
Aber wieso Stephen King? Der ist doch dabei Elno auf Twitter dauernd zu dissen. Eigentlich müsste Elmo ihn doch eher stummschalten. Ist das jetzt 5d Schach?
| |
Er wollte ihm Ärger mit den Followern machen. King hat den Trottelhaken als das bezeichnet, was er ist, ein 8 Dollar Orden für die Idiotensteuer auf Twitter und dass es ein sicheres Zeichen ist, dass er ermordet wurde und jemand seinen Account bespielt, um das zu vertuschen, wenn der Account einen Bezahlhaken kriegt.
Er wollte King unglaubwürdig machen und dann "lol i trol u" bringen weil er ein DUMMES ARSCHLOCH ist.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dieser verdammte Clown. Warum kann ihm nicht einfach jemand sein Smartphone wegnehmen.
Dieser Post besteht zu 85% aus recycelten Bestandteilen und ist deshalb umweltschonender als vergleichbare Posts mit komplett neuen Komponenten, die von Kohleofen-betriebenen Endgeräten versendet werden.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Zitat von loliger_rofler
King hat den Trottelhaken als das bezeichnet, was er ist, ein 8 Dollar Orden für die Idiotensteuer auf Twitter und dass es ein sicheres Zeichen ist, dass er ermordet wurde und jemand seinen Account bespielt, um das zu vertuschen, wenn der Account einen Bezahlhaken kriegt.
| |
ah ok, das ist die Info, die mir gefehlt hat.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Zitat von Sniedelfighter
| Zitat von loliger_rofler
King hat den Trottelhaken als das bezeichnet, was er ist, ein 8 Dollar Orden für die Idiotensteuer auf Twitter und dass es ein sicheres Zeichen ist, dass er ermordet wurde und jemand seinen Account bespielt, um das zu vertuschen, wenn der Account einen Bezahlhaken kriegt.
| |
ah ok, das ist die Info, die mir gefehlt hat. 
| |
Jou das macht auch viel mehr Sinn als mein BS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moment, Elno bezahlt Phteven den blauen Haken, damit es so aussieht, als wäre Phteven so blöd, für einen blauen Haken zu bezahlen? Hab ich das xD-Schach jetzt richtig verstanden?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Zitat von shp.makonnen
Moment, Elno bezahlt Phteven den blauen Haken, damit es so aussieht, als wäre Phteven so blöd, für einen blauen Haken zu bezahlen? Hab ich das xD-Schach jetzt richtig verstanden? 
| |
Jo, und nachdem King dann 7 Millionen Elontrottelfanskommentare mit "lol dachte Du wirst nicht zahlen xD haha cuck lol" bekommen hat, hat er es aufgeklärt weil er so ein lustiger Humorbolzen ist der blöde Saftsack.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

Stark. Ja, genau sowas würde ich auch tun als reichster Mensch der Erde. Wat n Schweinigel.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Zitat von shp.makonnen
Moment, Elno bezahlt Phteven den blauen Haken, damit es so aussieht, als wäre Phteven so blöd, für einen blauen Haken zu bezahlen? Hab ich das xD-Schach jetzt richtig verstanden? 
| |
Hat Egon auch mit LeBron James so gemacht, nachdem der vorher angekündigt hat, für den Quatsch nicht zu zahlen.
Was für ein Knecht
|
[Dieser Beitrag wurde 1 mal editiert; zum letzten Mal von [Muh!]Shadow am 21.04.2023 12:51]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Der hatte bestimmt viele Freunde im Sandkasten.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Zitat von shp.makonnen

Stark. Ja, genau sowas würde ich auch tun als reichster Mensch der Erde. Wat n Schweinigel.
| |
Und zweinundfucking 50 isser auch noch. Muss man sich mal geben.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wenn Musk richtig hart trollen wollen würde, könnte er einfach jeden Tag nem dutzend anderer Promis nen blauen Haken verpassen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RT hingegen ist sein Label als Lügenmedium wieder los.
clown.haken
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
407k Legacy Accounts abgeschaltet, 28 neue Twitter Blue Subs bekommen. Nice.
Wenn das so weitergeht, werden in rund 40 Jahren wieder alle namhaften Accounts ihren blauen Haken haben.
|
[Dieser Beitrag wurde 1 mal editiert; zum letzten Mal von Herr der Lage am 21.04.2023 23:15]
|
|
|
|
|
|
So sehr es erfreut, Erich Mumps beim Geldverbrennen und Scheissesein zuzuschauen, so sehr nervt es auch, dass er das unterm Strich legendär gute Twitter einfach zerfickt, der Kackvogel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Würde ich als Kollateralschaden hinnehmen, wenn Arno dafür Geld und Reputation (lölchen) verliert
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Zitat von Herr der Lage
Wenn das so weitergeht, werden in rund 40 Jahren wieder alle namhaften Accounts ihren blauen Haken haben.
| |
Sieht so aus, als würde er die gerade wieder "verschenken" an ehemals Behakte. Offenbar ohne System, aber wenn er das durchzieht bald sind wir wieder da, wo wir eh waren.
Plus 28 neue Accounts natürlich.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ist schon irre, wie Musk seinen 44-Milliarden-Kauf langsam zerlegt.
Vorher kannte ich Musk nur als Besitzer von Tesla und SpaceX, der gut in Kameras lächeln kann.
Als er Twitter kaufen wollte, dachte ich, dass er den Laden langsam unattraktiv macht, indem er Leute wie Trump zurückholt und gebannte rechte Ottos.
Aber was er tatsächlich mit Twitter anstellt, nachdem er mit seiner blöden Spüle da angelatscht kam, ist echt etwas ganz Besonderes. Das hätte ich so nicht erwartet...
Immerhin:
Gut finde ich ja, dass man jetzt den Algorithmus-Feed wieder besser benutzen kann, weil die meisten, denen ich folge, nun keine blauen Haken mehr haben. Die mit blauem Haken, denen ich nicht folge, kann ich darum leicht aussortieren und blocken.
Das nächste Twitter-Blue-Feature wird wahrscheinlich, dass man den blauen Haken verstecken kann...
https://twitter.com/Tazerface16/status/1649443447164776450
| This is what happens to your launchpad when you think it would be funny to launch to the world's largest rocket on 4/20, instead of when it's ready.
It will probably be at least a year before the FAA will approve another Starship launch.

Their is no fucking way that the FAA is going to allow a debacle like this to happen again without a rigorous post-mortem, and documented remediation plan.
The failure of the SpaceX launch yesterday can be directly linked to a personal decision that Elon Musk made 3 years ago to not install flame diverters on the Starship launchpad.
He overruled his own engineers on this design flaw, and admitted publicly.
It's his fault.
And because of this decision, the launchpad was blasted apart and debris slammed into the engines at the bottom of the booster, damaging them.
Ultimately resulting in the spectacular cartwheels and explosion that we saw just moments later.
Here's where they eventually ended up.
8 out of 33 engines failed, for a reliability rate of 75%.
That's super, super bad.


| |
https://twitter.com/MattBinder/status/1649197699080617984

https://twitter.com/Max_Fisher/status/1649499783609077760
| Feeling very validated in my theory that the future of Twitter is best predicted not by any verification drama but by the Tesla stock price
Reminder that Twitter is carrying a $1.2bn annual debt payment that it cannot afford & Musk can only afford by selling Tesla stock

| |
https://twitter.com/SouthpawLeftist/status/1649586553809674240
| After Elon offers a “1 million dogecoin” bounty to anyone able to prove his family had an emerald mine fortune, his DAD comes out and says “um, can I get in on that, cause I totally have proof of it” 😂 😂 ☠️


| |
https://twitter.com/PopBase/status/1649199143922057217
| Elon Musk reveals he is ‘personally paying’ the Twitter Blue subscriptions of some celebrities to keep their checkmark, such as Lebron James and Stephen King.
... | |
https://twitter.com/W7VOA/status/1649784491680972804
| #Twitter has added a "Subscribe and Pay" appeal asking me for $1,000 per month (plus any applicable tax) to qualify as a Verified Organization. "Each additional affiliated account is $50.00 per handle per month."
| |
https://twitter.com/Volksverpetzer/status/1649680058963881993
https://twitter.com/DFRLab/status/1649455086001684497
https://twitter.com/Shayan86/status/1649479455243378713
| THREAD: a collection of fake Twitter accounts after the removal of legacy verification
A fake account with Blue subscription posing as Sudan's Rapid Support Forces, currently involved in a conflict, falsely claimed the death of its leader Mohamed Dagalo, getting 1.7M views.
Several fake accounts are posing as New York Mayor Eric Adams.
...
| |
https://twitter.com/ltrlp/status/1649331738701594624

https://twitter.com/AricToler/status/1649789611349082112
| | easily the single most damaging thing Elon has done is surface paid blue subscribers in replies. not even close
every single remotely big tweet is just a list of people with 90 followers saying "ha" or "hmmm" or something
imagine coming up with a plan for your social media site that includes deliberately promoting tweets by people who can't get engagement without that promotion | |
Can't imagine what my Twitter habits will be in a month, but I'm already automatically scrolling down on tweets to get to non-checked replies without thinking about it.
| |
https://twitter.com/MattBinder/status/1649479416337031168

https://twitter.com/travisbrown/status/1649501612262543362

https://twitter.com/UsingCigarettes/status/1649832498040274948

https://twitter.com/travisbrown/status/1649663412824076289
| Since the scrape that turned up the 314 Twitter Blue (formerly) legacy verified sign-ups that went into this number, I’ve identified 474 new ones, including @JoelOsteen, @NFLonFOX, @RonDeSantisFL, and @paulg (who was gifted the subscription by Elon).
(Not exactly a club I would want to be a member of.) | |
https://twitter.com/neilhimself/status/1649156143866863618

https://twitter.com/KristerJohnson/status/1649183636833574914

https://twitter.com/SCOTUSblog/status/1649133133176946688

https://twitter.com/ParkerMolloy/status/1649781433437679620

| Also, for years, Twitter had been talking about the importance of prioritizing relevant content in algorithmic timelines and replies. Tossing that out and just prioritizing content from anyone who pays a fee, regardless of the relevancy of what they post, degrades the product.
It's a complete misunderstanding of what people look for in a social media platform in 2023. People like TikTok because it shows them things relevant to their interests. Imagine if TikTok just tossed its algorithm in favor of 100% payola? It would be worse for it.
| |
https://twitter.com/thephilosotroll/status/1649586690191925250

| Because of the way he rolled it out, nobody pays attention to the fact that he added some functionality to the blue subscription. It's just a way of signaling willingness to buy the product, which most people regard as silly. But it gets *worse* still.
See, he could have sold blue according to services; people might have paid to post videos (media and political accounts certainly would have). But *he* chose to make it about the check mark and removed the verification process; he picked that losing battle. But it gets worse.
Because by making the blue check now attached to subscribing, even legacy people who have it don't want it anymore, because it's seen as a symbol of gullibility. So groups like the NYT who might use the functionality won't pay, because the symbol makes them look dumb.
Elon took a definitive piece of intellectual property developed and principally associated with twitter, and made it a symbol of his own stupidity, destroyed its value, and damaged the value of his own subscription product. That's an impressive failure.
The more I think about it, the more this impresses me. The blue check was a *fascinating* piece of IP. It was a symbol developed in association with a corporation (Twitter) that became so ubiquitous that its major competitor (Meta) just took it and the symbol worked...
I'm not sure there are many cases where a symbol was (a) clearly associated in public consciousness with a particular product and (b) was used by the other major players in that industry without even trying to develop an alternative. And Elon flushed it down the toilet. Amazing.
| |
https://twitter.com/BenKuchera/status/1649462935473848340
| Twitter had the best influencer program in the world. The company created an incentive structure where the most famous people on the planet created content on the site, daily, for free. Destroyed in one day because the new owner thought Stephen King should pay to write for him.
And now no one wants the check, the new owner is forcing celebrities to take them for free even though they don't want them, and the people paying for them are complaining about how bad they are in their new promoted posts. Blue checks are paying to say they regret paying.
I'm mostly here because there's never been a time when someone spent billions of dollars to not listen to everyone and pick a fight with an entire service they own by degrading service and constantly changing features. Kendall Roy is breaking down in real time, but it's real life
I'm not celebrating; Twitter has brought me a lot of angst but also just as many opportunities, and that utility is mostly gone. The current system is bad for advertisers, bad for subscribers, bad for users, and dangerous for celebrities. Why stay?
| |
https://twitter.com/OAlexanderDK/status/1649733587468517384
| Our Chrome extension that makes legacy verification visible again is now live.
It is open source & uses publicly available data on legacy verified accounts & gives them a purple checkmark.
https://github.com/roberrrt-s/legacy-verified-extension
Thanks to @roberrrt_s's coding & @travisbrown's data collection | |
|
[Dieser Beitrag wurde 1 mal editiert; zum letzten Mal von Herr der Lage am 22.04.2023 22:16]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ich hoffe diese shitshow eskaliert ewig weiter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Also es bleibt unterhaltsam 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Egon vs Internet, wer gewinnt?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ich fürchte, alle verlieren bei sowas.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/RadioFreeTom/status/1649984867822628865
| For all of you who think Musk is some agent of Saudi investors or other nefarious actors who you think want to destroy Twitter, consider this: They're probably wincing right now. States with agendas want a strong and authoritative Twitter, not a joke site. Bear with me.
If your goal is to spread your agenda, you want the venue to be respected, full of dependable sources, so that your influence operations can be one more among those sources. If you're putting out bullshit, you want it on the same rack as the NYT and WaPo, not tabloids.
You also want to use your influence with the owner so that when you slip pollution into the info stream, it doesn't get lost. There are things regimes want to communicate. You want to create sources that *look* dependable and real.
Now, I get it that there's a theory that what you really want is to create a shitstorm so chaotic that no one knows what's what, but that's not nearly as a useful and you're not gonna spend billions just to let a child troll everyone.
My point is that what you're seeing right now doesn't help bad regimes. Musk is now giving gold badges to established media, but the rest of the site (where influence ops would need some stability and reliability) is now much less useful.
For the people who read tabloids and believe anything anyway, nothing here will make a difference. But the ability to impact a reasonable number of reasonable people is reduced when everything is a "look at me" pants-drop from Musk.
So, as usual, I'm suggesting that all this is not a plot, but merely that Musk has no idea what he's doing, and this is a lot of panic and chaos because he can't figure out (1) why people won't do what he's ordering them to do and (s) why he can't make money out of this site.
| |
https://twitter.com/RadioFreeTom/status/1649921178188783617
| Also, randomly handing out blue checks is pretty much the last ditch effort to stop people from mass-blocking blue checks.
The only thing missing from this is the Yakety Sax background music
| |
https://twitter.com/Shayan86/status/1649917639748116481
| The claim that Twitter is restoring verification to all accounts with at least one million followers is not true.
Some accounts with fewer than one million followers have had their verification restored, while some accounts with more than one million followers have not.
Former Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey, for instance, has 6.5 million followers, but remains unverified at the moment.
Who knows what might change on this platform half an hour from now, though.

On the other hand, Linkin Park frontman Chester Bennington, who has nearly 800,000 followers, has had his verification restored.
As you may know, he died in 2017.

| |
https://twitter.com/IanMcKellen/status/1649960973325963264

https://twitter.com/RonFilipkowski/status/1649857851056091136
| Things are going well.

| |
https://twitter.com/zachsilberberg/status/1649895746827698176
| so they gave dril the checkmark, but the checkmark goes away if you change your name, so dril just changed his name, but they gave him the checkmark again, so he changed his name again... this is the most looney tunes ass fight ive ever seen between a billionaire and a shitposter | |
|
[Dieser Beitrag wurde 5 mal editiert; zum letzten Mal von Herr der Lage am 23.04.2023 9:38]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wer immer schonmal Polizist sein wollte, jetzt zugreifen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diese ganze Shitshow ist traurig und verstörend.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Zitat von Herr der Lage
Ist schon irre, wie Musk seinen 44-Milliarden-Kauf langsam zerlegt.
Vorher kannte ich Musk nur als Besitzer von Tesla und SpaceX, der gut in Kameras lächeln kann.
Als er Twitter kaufen wollte, dachte ich, dass er den Laden langsam unattraktiv macht, indem er Leute wie Trump zurückholt und gebannte rechte Ottos.
Aber was er tatsächlich mit Twitter anstellt, nachdem er mit seiner blöden Spüle da angelatscht kam, ist echt etwas ganz Besonderes. Das hätte ich so nicht erwartet...
Immerhin:
Gut finde ich ja, dass man jetzt den Algorithmus-Feed wieder besser benutzen kann, weil die meisten, denen ich folge, nun keine blauen Haken mehr haben. Die mit blauem Haken, denen ich nicht folge, kann ich darum leicht aussortieren und blocken.
Das nächste Twitter-Blue-Feature wird wahrscheinlich, dass man den blauen Haken verstecken kann...
https://twitter.com/Tazerface16/status/1649443447164776450
| This is what happens to your launchpad when you think it would be funny to launch to the world's largest rocket on 4/20, instead of when it's ready.
It will probably be at least a year before the FAA will approve another Starship launch.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FuQAExHaMAEtvNv?format=jpg&name=small
Their is no fucking way that the FAA is going to allow a debacle like this to happen again without a rigorous post-mortem, and documented remediation plan.
The failure of the SpaceX launch yesterday can be directly linked to a personal decision that Elon Musk made 3 years ago to not install flame diverters on the Starship launchpad.
He overruled his own engineers on this design flaw, and admitted publicly.
It's his fault.
And because of this decision, the launchpad was blasted apart and debris slammed into the engines at the bottom of the booster, damaging them.
Ultimately resulting in the spectacular cartwheels and explosion that we saw just moments later.
Here's where they eventually ended up.
8 out of 33 engines failed, for a reliability rate of 75%.
That's super, super bad.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FuQCYI9aEAAXIOs?format=jpg&name=360x360
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FuQJdtaaAAA6QZX?format=jpg&name=small
| |
| |
Der Ausfall von einzelnen Triebwerke war doch geplant/erwartet, sonst hätte SpaceX doch keine Grafik dafür vorbereitet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thema: Twitter ( geliebt, gemusked, gerettet? ) |
|