|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
... und sobald einer dieser hohlköppe durchdreht heisst es direkt "it was antifa!". ich bin es.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Zitat von Phillinger
Uff, was ne miese Agenda. Und die zieht das durch. Wie verkommen kann man sein? Ist das schon pathologisch?
| |
Nennt sich "accusation in a mirror" und ist ein Arschlochwerkzeug von Arschlöchern für Arschlöcher.
| |
Accusation in a mirror (AiM), mirror politics,[1] mirror propaganda, mirror image propaganda, or mirror argument is a hate-speech incitement technique. AiM refers to falsely imputing to one's adversaries the intentions that one has for oneself and/or the action that one is in the process of enacting.[2][3][4]
The term in French, "accusation en miroir", was described in a paragraph in a 1970 adult education manual entitled Psychologie de la publicite et de la propagandepart of a large, comprehensive series of ESF Collection formation permanente publications intended for adult education and professional formation. The French author and editor, Roger Mucchielli, intended the material to educate others to be able to identify publicity and propaganda techniques in order to thwart them.[5] Mucchielli explained how the perpetrator who intends to start a war will proclaim his peaceful intentions and accuse the adversary of warmongering; he who uses terror will accuse the adversary of terrorism.[2]
However, during the 1994 Rwandan genocide AiM was usedalong with other propaganda techniquesby the Hutus to incite the genocide.[6] By invoking collective self-defense, "accusation in a mirror" justifies genocide, just as self-defense is a defense for individual homicide.[4] Susan Benesch remarked that while dehumanization "makes genocide seem acceptable", accusation in a mirror makes it seem necessary.[7][8]
| |
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accusation_in_a_mirror
GOP fährt seit Trump ja unverhohlen genozidale Rhetorik, vor allem gegen PoC und trans Menschen, das ist einfach der logische Endpunkt dieser Entwicklung
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Supreme Courts Big New Term
There is a feeling with this Court that the conservative Justices could make a landmark ruling out of almost any case.
| |
Yet there is a feeling that the conservative Justices could make a landmark ruling out of almost any case. Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency, the first case of the term, may seem to address a narrow questionthe definition of navigable watersbut it could become a vehicle for dismantling a wide range of regulations. Haaland v. Brackeen, a challenge to the 1978 Indian Child Welfare Act, could upend relations between the government and federally recognized tribes. The Court will also adjudicate a suit, brought by Texas and Louisiana, claiming that the Biden Administration has, in effect, broken the law by focussing its border-enforcement efforts only on certain categories of migrants, such as those deemed a threat to public safety. Notably, some Republicans have raised the possibility that, if the G.O.P. takes control of the House after the midterms, they may impeach President Biden on similar grounds.
The most explosive cases, however, may be the ones in which the Court will rule on how elections work. One of them, Merrill v. Milligan, will be heard on Tuesday. After the 2020 census, Alabama redrew its congressional districts; the new map, like the old one, has only one Black-majority district out of seven, in a state that is more than a quarter Black. Local civil-rights groups are challenging the map under the Voting Rights Act, but their chances seem dim. In 2013, Roberts wrote the majority opinion in Shelby County v. Holder, a case that significantly weakened the act, and there is concern that Merrill may finish it off. At Salve Regina, Kagan said, of the Justices mandate to protect voting rights, I dont think the Court has done this job particularly well.
Merrill may be a prelude to a case that could be even more destabilizing to American democracy: Moore v. Harper, for which the oral arguments have yet to be scheduled. Moore also involves congressional-district mapsthis time for North Carolina. After the states highest court threw out a gerrymandered map, Republican legislators appealed. The Supreme Court eventually took the case and agreed to consider a version of what is known as the independent state legislature theory, which holds that the power the Constitution grants state legislatures to organize elections cannot be limited by a states judiciary or constitutionor perhaps by much of anything. A broad decision in the case could make it far easier for state legislatures to engage in gerrymandering or voter suppression, or to intervene even more directly in the electoral process.
| |
Cool beans, Demokratie tot weil alte rechte Wichers zu viele alte rechte Wichser in die "alte rechte Wichser unter Kontrolle halten" Institution gesetzt haben.
Scheiss Republikaner.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ist jetzt raus, ich lass das mal ungelesen als Tipp hier.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dark Brandon hat gestern eiskalt das F-Wort gedroppt.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Very unpresidential. An embarrassment to this Nation. [/tucker]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Midterm-Elections in den USA und bei den Senatswahlen sind 2 Staaten aktuell im Mittelpunkt, weil es dort sehr knapp ist: Georgia und Nevada
Wie siehts in Georgia aus?
Warnock(Dem) tritt gegen Walker(Rep) an. Warnock ist Baptistenpastor und Walker ist ein ehemaliger NFL-Spieler.
Was sind die Positionen von Walker?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raphael_Warnock
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herschel_Walker
2 Themen als Beispiel von Walker:
| | Environment
When asked about the Green New Deal environmental program, Walker said that he opposed it because "Since we don't control the air, our good air decided to float over to China's bad air, so when China gets our good air, their bad air got to move," adding, "So it moves over to our good air space. Then, now, we got we to clean that back up." In August 2022, in response to questions about the passage of the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, which includes funding to counteract climate change, Walker said, "They continue to try to fool you that they are helping you out. But they’re not". Possibly referring to a provision that allocated $1.5 billion to the U.S. Forest Service’s Urban and Community Forestry Program, Walker added, "Because a lot of money, it’s going to trees. Don’t we have enough trees around here?" | |
| | Abortion rights
See also: Abortion in Georgia (U.S. state)
In May 2022, Walker stated he opposes abortion, and wants no exceptions to abortion bans. He also called for more money to promote adoption and to support single parents. "You never know what a child is going to become. And I've seen some people, they've had some tough times, but I always said, 'No matter what, tough times make tough people.'" When asked about the impact of the issue on the November 2022 election, Walker described abortion rights as among the "things that people are not concerned about". In September 2022, Walker endorsed legislation proposed by Senator Lindsey Graham that would ban abortion except for rape, incest, and the life of the patient after 15 weeks of pregnancy nationwide. | |
Was sind die neusten Entwicklungen?
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/oct/06/herschel-walker-abortion-mother-children
| | A woman who said Herschel Walker paid for her abortion in 2009 is the mother of one of his children, according to a new report, undercutting the Georgia Republican Senate candidate’s claims he didn’t know who she was.
Democratic Georgia Senator Raphael Warnock
The pastor v the football player: can Raphael Warnock tackle Herschel Walker?
Read more
The Daily Beast, which first reported the abortion, said it had agreed not to reveal details of the woman’s identity.
Walker, who has expressed support for a national abortion ban without exceptions, called the abortion allegation a “flat-out lie”, threatened a lawsuit against the outlet and said he had no idea who the woman might be.
On Wednesday night, the Beast revealed that the woman – who was not named – was so well known to Walker that, according to her, they conceived another child years after the abortion. She decided to continue with the pregnancy, though she noted that Walker, as during the earlier pregnancy, expressed that it wasn’t a convenient time for him, the outlet reported. | |
Ein anderer seiner Söhne hat auch keinen Bock mehr auf seinen Vater und veröffentlicht Videos:
https://twitter.com/ChristianWalk1r/status/1577284445367042049
Fazit:
Der Wahlkampf könnte den Bach runtergehen für Walker und damit steigen die Chancen für die Demokraten den Senat zu gewinnen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bei Beau ging es letztens auch darum, dass die Dems die größten leerdenker der Reps unterstützen, so dass das Duell dann unwählbaree Kasper vs moderate Dem ist. Scheint zu funktionieren.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | On the above occasion Walker also discussed transgender children, stating: "they're telling the young kids in school, you can be a boy tomorrow even if you're a girl ... But I want the young kids to know you go to heaven. Jesus may not recognize you. Because he made you a boy. He made you a girl." | |
Mein Hirn käst.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Echt mal. Als ob der allwissende Gott seine Schäfchen nicht wiedererkennt.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Der Kerl konnte halt mal genau eine Sache fol gut, schnell rennen obwohl Leute ihn aufhalten wollen  Ist halt ein bisschen so als würdest du heute Lothar Matthäus als Spitzenkandidat der CSU bei einer Landtagswahl in Bayern aufstellen...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delta beschwört es echt grad rauf.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maggus, Lodda ... namentlich ginge da was.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Breaking:
Biden Pardons Thousands of People Convicted of Marijuana Possession Under Federal Law https://nyti.ms/3yJMJD9
WASHINGTON President Biden on Thursday pardoned all people convicted of marijuana possession under federal law and said his administration would review whether marijuana should still be a Schedule 1 drug like heroin and LSD, saying that makes no sense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LSD hat da eigentlich auch nichts zu suchen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Zitat von Delta
Der Kerl konnte halt mal genau eine Sache fol gut, schnell rennen obwohl Leute ihn aufhalten wollen Ist halt ein bisschen so als würdest du heute Lothar Matthäus als Spitzenkandidat der CSU bei einer Landtagswahl in Bayern aufstellen...
| |
Ist das diese Strategie, von der oben die Rede war: Unwählbare Volldeppen zum Kandidaten der Gegenseite machen?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Zitat von Phiasm
LSD hat da eigentlich auch nichts zu suchen.
| |
Dann kann mans ja auch so lassen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Es geht weiter:
| | A top Justice Department official told former President Donald J. Trump’s lawyers in recent weeks that the department believed he had not returned all the documents he took when he left the White House, according to two people briefed on the matter.
The outreach from the official, Jay I. Bratt, who leads the department’s counterintelligence operations, is the most concrete indication yet that investigators remain skeptical that Mr. Trump has been fully cooperative in their efforts to recover documents the former president was supposed to have turned over to the National Archives at the end of his term.
It is not clear what steps the Justice Department might take to retrieve any material it thinks Mr. Trump still holds.
And it is not known whether the Justice Department has gathered new evidence that Mr. Trump has held onto government material even after the court-authorized search in August of his private club and residence in Florida, Mar-a-Lago, and 18 months of previous efforts by the federal government to convince the former president to return what he had taken on leaving office.
The Justice Department declined to comment.
The outreach from the department prompted a rift among Mr. Trump’s lawyers about how to respond, with one camp counseling a cooperative approach that would include bringing in an outside firm to conduct a further search for documents and another advising Mr. Trump to maintain a more combative posture.
The more combative camp, the people briefed on the matter said, won out. | |
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/06/us/politics/trump-white-house-documents-lawyers.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Zitat von Phiasm
LSD hat da eigentlich auch nichts zu suchen.
| |
Dank den Hippies die plötzlich nicht mehr stumpf konsumieren wollten und sich eine andere Gesellschaft wünschten. Wo kommen wir denn da hin, wenn viele Leute gleichzeitig seltsame Ideen bekommen?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | The Jan. 6 House select committee hearings this week are among the most important of all, because they will foreground a topic that many Americans ordinarily don’t associate with their democracy, even after the events of the insurrection: political violence.
The Tuesday proceeding will focus on militias and paramilitary groups that helped bring us to the precipice on Jan. 6, 2021. The Thursday hearing will examine President Donald Trump’s derelict conduct as the violence raged — and how this was intimately entangled with the desire of Trump and many of his MAGA followers to overturn our political order.
But hovering over these hearings will be a broader, unanswered question: whether the United States is developing an endemic problem with political violence and, in coming years, how bad it might get.
For an unflinching look at this larger context, I reached out to Rachel Kleinfeld, a specialist in political conflict who has studied the breakdown of democracy and the rule of law in many countries. | |
| | Sargent: What would a further spiraling downward from here look like? One can imagine something like this: Threats of violence toward election administrators get worse. Election outcomes, particularly when Republicans lose, are violently contested with more regularity. Now-routine chatter about Democratic rule being illegitimate gets increasingly endorsed by GOP party actors, leading to violent attacks on politicians.
Some experts in democratic breakdown fear something akin to “the Troubles” in Ireland. What’s your worry? Is it similar to what I just laid out?
Kleinfeld: It’s actually a little worse. The percentages of Americans endorsing violence are approaching Northern Ireland’s Troubles at their height in 1973.
Right now, the antidemocratic faction of Republicans is targeting three groups: the pro-democratic faction of Republicans; election officials in both parties who are maintaining free and fair elections; and a lot of regular people they’re targeting with dehumanization and violence, to build their own base.
If the antidemocratic faction wins, then I think the heightened violence we’re seeing now will continue. But if they start losing, then they’ve built up a lot of hatred — a lot of distrust in the system — and then the violence is going to get out of their control. It’ll look more like an insurgency. A disaffected left, not connected to the Democratic Party, is also justifying violence. It could get ugly. | |
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/07/11/gop-political-violence-militias-jan-6-democratic-breakdown/
E: Und Tulsi Gabbard verlässt die Dems:
https://twitter.com/TulsiGabbard/status/1579788950696185859
| | I can no longer remain in today’s Democratic Party that is now under the complete control of an elitist cabal of warmongers driven by cowardly wokeness, who divide us by racializing every issue & stoke anti-white racism, actively work to undermine our God-given freedoms, are…
…hostile to people of faith & spirituality, demonize the police & protect criminals at the expense of law-abiding Americans, believe in open borders, weaponize the national security state to go after political opponents, and above all, dragging us ever closer to nuclear war.
I believe in a government that is of, by, and for the people. Unfortunately, today’s Democratic Party does not. Instead, it stands for a government of, by, and for the powerful elite. I’m calling on my fellow common sense independent-minded Democrats to join me….
…in leaving the Democratic Party. If you can no longer stomach the direction that so-called woke Democratic Party ideologues are taking our country, I invite you to join me. | |
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1579788950696185859.html
|
|
[Dieser Beitrag wurde 3 mal editiert; zum letzten Mal von Nighty am 11.10.2022 14:00]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boah ey, ersten 15 (!) Sekunden:
- driven by elite warmonger
- cowardly wokeness
- racialising EvErYtHiNg
- anti-white racism (äh ja hallo punkt 3)
Da habe ich dann auch einfach aufgelegt. Was ist das überhaupt für eine Tante. Nach Wikipedia hätte die schon länger zur GOP wechseln sollen hat man das Gefühl.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Das hier ist auch gut:
Was für ein schlechter Vater! SAD!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Zitat von Shooter
Boah ey, ersten 15 (!) Sekunden:
- driven by elite warmonger
- cowardly wokeness
- racialising EvErYtHiNg
- anti-white racism (äh ja hallo punkt 3)
Da habe ich dann auch einfach aufgelegt. Was ist das überhaupt für eine Tante. Nach Wikipedia hätte die schon länger zur GOP wechseln sollen hat man das Gefühl.
| |
Die war ein nobody und hatte politisch keine Relevanz oder Überlebenschance und macht seit 2 Jahren asverkau auf fox news. Nur ein weiterer grifter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Höchste Zeit für SpendenSchenkungen seiner Fans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | Behind-the-scenes video of Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer and other leaders during 1/6, calling governors, the attorney general and the DOD secretary for help as the mob Trump sent to the Capitol overran police. | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
die haben in die gänge gekackt????
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Thema: Der Biden-Thread ( USA Staffel 2 ) |
![AUP [Muh!]Shadow 10.03.2015](./avatare/upload/U50324--muhshadownewversion3kyhuza.png)
![[KDO2412]Mr.Jones](./avatare/mrjones2.gif)
